saralby CapEasy

iSAFE vs SAFE: why the Indian version is a different animal

05 of 14 · 4 min read

US SAFE vs Indian iSAFE

Legal nature (US)
A contract — neither debt nor equity until conversion
Legal nature (India)
Must be a security: CCPS or CCD wrapper
Why
Companies Act + FEMA don’t recognise “neither debt nor equity”
Consequence
Allotment formalities, PAS-3, valuation and FEMA rules apply NOW, not later

The Y Combinator SAFE is beloved because it defers everything: no valuation, no shares issued, just a contract that converts later. Founders in India often assume they can use the same document. They cannot — not as-is.

Indian company law does not have a "neither debt nor equity" bucket. Money coming into a company against future shares must take the form of a recognised security. So the Indian adaptation — the iSAFE — is legally wrapped as Compulsorily Convertible Preference Shares (or sometimes CCDs) carrying SAFE-style economics: a valuation cap, a discount, MFN protection.

That legal wrapper has real consequences. Issuing an iSAFE IS an allotment: private placement procedure, PAS-3 within 15 days, valuation requirements, stamp duty. If the investor is foreign, FEMA reporting (FC-GPR within 30 days) applies at issue — not at conversion. The "we’ll do the paperwork later" mental model of the US SAFE is exactly wrong here.

None of this makes iSAFEs bad — they are still fast and founder-friendly. But they are securities from day one, and the compliance clock starts at issue.

The filings clock, tracking statutory deadlines like the ones covered in this explainer.

This explainer is general information, not legal or tax advice. Statutes change and facts differ — confirm decisions with a practising CS/CA.

Run the numbers

Exit waterfall simulator, free.

Model how the CCPS wrapper behind an iSAFE converts at exit.

Open the calculator

Get the next explainer (and early access) by email:

← All explainers