saralby CapEasy

Rule 11UA: how unquoted shares are valued (and what changed for angel tax)

09 of 14 · 5 min read

Rule 11UA at a glance

What it values
Unquoted equity shares — the FMV a share issue is benchmarked against
Two core methods
NAV (book-based) or DCF (projected cash flows)
Who signs a DCF
A SEBI-registered merchant banker — since 2018, not a CA
Report freshness
Valuation date within 90 days of the share issue
Angel tax, Sec 56(2)(viib)
Abolished for all investors from FY 2024-25 — see below

Rule 11UA of the Income-tax Rules is the method book for putting a number on something with no market price: the fair market value (FMV) of unquoted equity shares. When a private company issues shares, the price it charges is measured against this FMV — so this one valuation is the benchmark almost every Indian equity event is quietly judged against.

Two methods do most of the work. The Net Asset Value (NAV) method is book-based — assets minus liabilities, per share — conservative, cheap, and common for early or asset-light companies. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method values the company on its projected future cash flows, which usually supports a higher number for a growth startup. The catch, since a 2018 amendment: a DCF report can only be signed by a SEBI-registered merchant banker, not a chartered accountant — and the valuation date has to sit within 90 days of the share issue for the report to hold.

For years the reason founders feared this rule was “angel tax” — Section 56(2)(viib), which taxed the amount a company raised above its FMV as the company’s own income. Price your round a rupee too high against a conservative NAV and the excess could be taxed at over 30%. That section was abolished for all classes of investors from financial year 2024-25 (announced in the July 2024 Budget), so the specific angel-tax trap that made Rule 11UA a founder nightmare is gone.

Rule 11UA did not become irrelevant, though. A foreign investor still cannot buy shares below FMV — FEMA pricing guidelines lean on a registered valuer’s number, and clearing FC-GPR with the RBI depends on it. The FMV still matters on the receiving side under Section 56(2)(x), and any serious diligence, ESOP perquisite calculation, or secondary sale wants a defensible valuation on file. The panic is lower; the discipline is the same.

The filings clock, tracking statutory deadlines like the ones covered in this explainer.

This explainer is general information, not legal or tax advice. Statutes change and facts differ — confirm decisions with a practising CS/CA.

Get the next explainer (and early access) by email:

← All explainers